A Look At Vampires Over The Years…

Robert Pattinson is vampire Edward Cullen  and Kristen Stewart is Bella Swan in “The Twilight Saga: New Moon.” (Summit Entertainment)

 On Friday, Johnny Depp brings his coolly comic take on the vampire to the big screen with “Dark Shadows,” a movie that’s expected to be so popular that no major film is being released against it.

That’s not a big surprise given the reteaming of Depp and director Tim Burton in the homage to the 1960s TV show — and given the popularity of vampires.

Just how prevalent are vampires on the silver screen? A search under “movies” on Vampire Rave, an Internet database dedicated to all things vampire, leads to 678 entries. With multi-reel feature films being about 100 years old, that works out to an average of more than six vampire movies coming out every single year over the past 100 years.

The first movies with “vampire” in the titles, however, weren’t supernatural horror films. They were about “vamps,” evil femme fatale types. But in 1922, all of that changed with “Nosferatu.”

Directed by F.W. Murnau and starring Max Schreck as a feral, animalistic creature, “Nosferatu” is an unauthorized adaptation of Bram Stoker’s 1897 novel, “Dracula,” the book that is the basis for nearly every tale of the undead bloodsuckers in print, on stage or on celluloid. A silent film, “Nosferatu” remains among the most frightening of all vampire pictures, and Schreck’s performance as the rodent-like creature is unforgettable.

The classic vampire first came to the screen in 1931 with “Dracula,” a picture based on a play that was taken from the Stoker novel. It starred Bela Lugosi as Dracula and established many of now-standard vampire characteristics. That starts with his accent (Lugosi was Hungarian) and extends through his sweeping cape, his turning into a bat and, most important, the transformation of Dracula from a hideous creature into a handsome nobleman.

“Dracula,” one of the Universal horror/monster franchises along with Frankenstein, The Wolfman and the Creature from the Black Lagoon, generated sequels — starting a pattern for vampire pictures that continues today. And Lugosi was the Count for the remainder of his career.

Christopher Lee took Lugosi’s place as the top fanged star in 1958’s “Horror of Dracula” and played the role six times in films. He was, however, able to avoid the Dracula typecasting that plagued Lugosi and continues, at nearly 90, to appear in films today.

In 1967, a gothic soap opera added a new character, Barnabas Collins. He was a vampire, played by the late Jonathan Frid, on “Dark Shadows,” which had begun a year earlier and ran until 1971.

By then Dracula was being given all kinds of treatments, from comedic to the 1972 blaxploitation version, “Blacula.”

By the 1990s, serious actors and directors and movie stars got in on the vampire act.

“Bram Stoker’s Dracula,” a 1992 picture that’s closely based on Stoker’s novel, had Francis Ford Coppola behind the camera and starred Gary Oldman as the count, Winona Ryder as his love and Anthony Hopkins as Van Helsing, the vampire slayer.

Two years later, Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise starred in the film adaptation of Anne Rice’s novel “Interview With the Vampire,” a film that also introduced a young actress to wide visibility, Kirsten Dunst.

Vampires have filled the screens in the last decades primarily in series. The “Blade” movies began in 1998, and the “Underworld” pictures first came to screens in 2003.

The biggest, most lucrative of the vampire franchises was launched in 2005 with the publication of the “Twilight” novel; the first “Twilight” film opened in 2008. That was the first of five films based on Stephenie Meyer’s novels about a young woman, played by Kristen Stewart, who is in love with a vampire, played by Robert Pattinson. “Twilight” took in $192 million at the box office, the least of any of the four pictures in the series. Together, the four “Twilight” movies have grossed $1 billion, and “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part II” is set for release Nov. 11.

Vampires also have become a small-screen staple, with today’s most notable entries appearing on the HBO series “True Blood.” Its fifth season will debut June 10.

But this week belongs to Depp’s Barnabas Collins, who is oh-so-polite before he sinks his fangs into your neck.

Read more: http://journalstar.com/entertainment/movies/we-love-vampires-a-look-at-pop-culture-s-bloodsuckers/article_2eb6e58d-e8d7-59ad-8366-7f23b2543460.html#ixzz1uTGgY4dB

The Summer Movie Posse Takes a Look at the Summer Movies ……

 

 

I’ve heard lots of talk in the past few years that movie stars don’t really matter anymore. But nothing made the point in such dramatic fashion as the reaction I got from 11 teenagers after they watched the trailer for “Total Recall,” Sony’s upcoming remake of Paul Verhoeven’s classic 1990 sci-fi thriller.

This marks the 11th year that I’ve tried to make sense of the summer movies by showing their trailers to a group of teens, known as the Summer Movie Posse. This year’s group, assembled by 15-year-old Mica Nafshun-Bone from friends who attend New Roads School and Santa Monica High, graded and critiqued 14 trailers from the most anticipated summer films, offering both wildly enthusiastic approval and witheringly blunt dismissals of the new crop of films.

It’s no big surprise that they were dazzled by the trailer for “The Dark Knight.” It wasn’t a shock to see them left cold by “Men in Black 3,” whose trailer hasn’t been getting raves among older fans, either. But what was so surprising about their reaction to “Total Recall” was their complete obliviousness to its cast of well-known actors.

The film is populated with prominent names, notably Colin Farrell, Kate Beckinsale, Jessica Biel and Bryan Cranston. But of the 11 members of the posse, only two knew anyone who was in the film (both of them pinpointing Farrell). Their perspective is strikingly youth-o-centric. Everyone instantly recognized “Snow White and the Huntsman’s” Kristen Stewart, who was the subject of a lively debate over her bona fides, including why her eyes are brown in the “Twilight” films but appear green in “Snow White.”

But Stewart was really the only dramatic actor whose presence mattered. There was a little buzz for Mila Kunis, who costars in “Ted,” and some genuine respect for “Dark Shadows’” Johnny Depp, whose puckishness makes him a perennial favorite with teens. But even such top-tier stars as Will Smith, Robert Downey Jr. and Dwayne (The Rock) Johnson barely registered — and not always in a positive fashion. When discussing “Snow White and the Huntsman,” Max Nath, 16, could characterize Charlize Theron only as “that other woman.”

 

Andrew Garfield, who stars in “The Amazing Spider-Man,” didn’t make a real impression. Channing Tatum went unnoticed in “G.I. Joe: Retaliation” and it even took a long time for the posse to puzzle out that the redhead in “The Avengers” was Scarlett Johansson. 

Outside of Stewart, a polarizing figure because of her pivotal role in the “Twilight” series, the only stars who really counted were the comics. That’s probably why four of the five top-graded films were comedies, led, surprisingly, by “The Campaign,” a broad comedy set in the world of politics that costars Will Ferrell and Zach Galifianakis. (The latter was recognized as much because of his Funny or Die Web show, “Between Two Ferns,” as for his films.)

The posse’s members are big fans of Ferrell as well as Sacha Baron Cohen, who stars in “The Dictator,” the No. 2-ranked film. They also gave high grades to “Ted,” even though its star, Mark Wahlberg, was so far off their radar that Carrie Grossman, 14, referred to him as “Mark whoever he is.” “Ted’s” cred came from the fact that it was directed by “Family Guy” creator Seth MacFarlane, a posse favorite.

After hearing the posse share its views, it was clear that it has a serious case of superhero fatigue. That even includes “The Avengers,” which is already breaking box-office records, but finished in the middle of the pack with the posse. As Isaac Galan, 15, put it: “It really feels a little cartoonish. I mean, is it a movie or a video game?”

The more gimmicky the movie, the more suspicion it raised (even if it’s based on a bestselling novel.) The film that scored the worst, “Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter,” was derided for trying to cash in on the success of a certain vampire film. Ariel Astrup, 14, got a big round of laughter when she said: “That’s a really, really bad idea. Like, why not ‘Twilight’ as Abraham Lincoln?”

For the posse, the superhero-style films, from “G.I. Joe” to “Spider Man” and “Men in Black” were simply underwhelming. “The frequency of all those superhero movies makes you think they’re just doing them to get another movie out,” said Jeremy Arnold, 17. “I wish they’d think of something more original. I mean, how many superheroes is too many superheroes?”

Here’s a sampling of comments:

‘The Campaign’

Max Nath: “Zach Galifianakis is really funny, maybe because he has such a strange innocence to him. It’s a great satire of the way politics in America works — that the candidates don’t really stand for anything.”

Elias Richter, 17: “It’s funny because it feels really different. We haven’t seen a comedy about politics in a long time.”

Jeremy Arnold: “I don’t like the premise — that the choice in elections is only between two idiots. But I have to admit it’s really funny.”

‘Prometheus’

Phoebe Kiekhofer, 16: “There’s way too much screaming in the trailer. It gave me a serious headache.”

Ariel Astrup: “The flashing is bad too. I was just getting into it, especially with the weird things crawling on the ceiling, but the flashing was too much like ‘Halo.’ Yuck!”

Jeremy: “It felt like a cross between ‘Alien’ and ‘National Treasure.’ I know there are some big names in the movie, but that’s not gonna get me to see it.”

Jannah Ustaris, 14: “I agree. The screaming was way too much for me.”

‘Snow White and the Huntsman’

Karim Sharif, 15: “I’m not a fan of this trend of taking fairy-tale classics and making them into dark, twisted stories. The plot was way too predictable, but it just didn’t feel like the story was my story anymore.”

Aria Lentini, 15: “I would’ve just blown this off as a cheesy, sappy movie ’cause Kristin Stewart was in it, but the trailer actually looks pretty good.”

Ariel: “I know everyone hates Kristin because of ‘Twilight.’ But if you’d seen her in her other movies, like ‘Panic Room,’ you’d see she can actually act.”

Jeremy: “Seeing her in the trailer was a bad omen. It just feels like they’re using her to get people out to the theaters.”

‘Men in Black 3’

Karim: “It feels really cheesy. I mean, another movie about time travel?”

Carrie Grossman: “This makes me want to go back and see the first one. But not this one.”

Jeremy: “Isn’t it kind of gimmicky to have Josh Brolin play a young Tommy Lee Jones? It’s like a ‘Saturday Night Live’ impression. And anyway, isn’t Tommy Lee Jones 75 or something?”

‘G.I. Joe: Retaliation’

Aria: “I don’t know why they make children’s toys into movies. It feels redundant. And was that the Rock? After he’s been in all those kids’ movies, having him in an action movie really doesn’t work.”

Ariel: “And was that Bruce Willis? Man, he’s getting way too old to be running around like that!”

 Author: Patrick Goldstein
Source: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/movies/2012/05/summer-movie-posse-movie-stars-dont-cut-it-with-these-kids-.html

Twilight Vampires vs Dracula: What Do People Think?

Christopher Lee in Dracula: Prince of Darkness and Robert Pattinson in The Twilight Saga: New Moon

Will there be blood? … Christopher Lee in Dracula: Prince of Darkness and Robert Pattinson in The Twilight Saga: New Moon. Photo: Wild Bunch Distribution/Allstar

Since Reading group contributor Michelle1978 chose this month’s theme, I’m going to hand the start of this article to her and a post worth quoting at length:

 

I may be biased as it was my suggestion that came out of the hat but I’m glad that we’re looking at these books. For me, Dracula by Bram Stoker is the scarier of the vampires – I first read it when I was 18 during a really hot summer and refused to sleep with the window open at night just in case. Wasn’t until I got to the end of the book that I allowed air into my bedroom. I want my vampires to scare me and Dracula definitely did – a big part of this was because he didn’t actually appear that often. So much of the terror and suspense was in the perceptions of the Harkers, Lucy, Van Helsing and so on. This made it scarier for me, as a big part of terror is fear in the mind and often the reality is less scary. Not having Dracula around so much meant that he could be as scary as the imagination would let him be. And all the gothic associations add to that.

On the other hand, Edward and the Cullens are around and by getting to know them you sympathise with them and see that they are just misunderstood. And the other vampires that the Cullens meet who aren’t as pleasant and vegetarian still don’t have that scare factor, and secretly even when the blood hits the fan you know that everyone will be all right at the end and come through unscathed …

I like them both, but as for me vampires are meant to be scary and I want to be frightened so much I daren’t open the window until I reach the end of the book, Dracula wins the fight. Having said that, I probably would prefer it if Robert Pattinson appeared on my window sill rather than Christopher Lee

 

Michelle1978 has smartly avoided the siren call of subtexts and gone straight for the central issue (one, I must admit I might have ignored but for her comments): vampires are supposed to be frightening and a good part of their appeal should comes from the thrill of fear.

Except, there’s a problem. Does anyone actually find vampires frightening? I’m not certain. I can easily imagine how much fun it must be to be scared witless by Dracula, or even Edward Cullen. But I have to imagine, because neither of them bothered me at all. I wouldn’t want to deny the macabre fascination of Bram Stoker’s story in particular, or the gothic appeal of his graveyard imagery, the dark ruins of Whitby Abbey and the forbidding Transylvanian castle. Even so, the book strikes me as more of a comfort read than anything else. The occasional moments of dark and cold serve only to offset the cocoa-warmth of the rest. Edward Cullen, meanwhile, is about as threatening as Justin Bieber – and just as sanitised. As Kicvae says, at least Dracula has blood on his fangs:

 

It feels like there’s a strong impulse to tame the vampire in modern interpretations; to keep all his attractive qualities – his beauty, charm, power, erudition, etc, but get rid of the inconvenient fact that he eats people! He’s become an idealised fantasy figure instead of a monster. The best stories play on this tension between the fantasy and the monstrosity but I felt in Twilight the de-fanging had gone too far. Honestly, the book started to feel like one long mantra – Bella is awkward, Edward is beautiful, Bella is awkward, Edward is beautiful, repeat ad infinitum!

 

Kicvae goes on:

If you subscribe to the idea that Bram Stoker’s vampires represented a fear of sexuality in a very sexually repressed society then it makes sense that this aspect tends to be played down in modern vampire stories. Although we’re arguably just as obsessed with sex as the Victorians, we’re generally nowhere near as repressed, so modern-day vampires are more beautiful than their Victorian counterparts but much less seductive. It’s just a theory but I wonder whether contemporary vampire stories reflect society’s fears over drug addiction rather than sex, so the abstinent vampire reflects the heroin addict trying to quit but under constant temptation and it’s this out-of-control addict/vampire who is seen to pose the threat to social stability.

 

Well, it’s an interesting theory. Although from what little I know of Stephenie Meyer I find it hard to believe that smack is a major preoccupation of hers. Sex, however, clearly is. Even if they preach abstinence, her books are as much about the beast with two backs as the one that sucks you dry of blood. So too is Bram Stoker’s Dracula. And so too are Carmilla, Interview with the Vampire and just about every other story I’ve read featuring the undead blood-suckers, except possibly I Am Legend. Vampires are positively Freudian  –as the great Austrian himself pointed out: “All human experiences of morbid dread signify the presence of repressed sexual and aggressive wishes, and in vampirism we see these repressed wishes becoming plainly visible.”

It’s hard to argue with that. While I’m calling on famous dead intellectuals, it’s also worth noting Voltaire’s line on vampires. In 1762, he noted that they may have been fading from folklore, but were now “stock-jobbers, brokers, and men of business, who sucked the blood of the people in broad daylight but they were not dead, though corrupted. These true suckers lived not in cemeteries, but in very agreeable palaces.” Stoker’s Dracula could easily be seen as a metaphor for the wealthy man who feeds upon the less fortunate.

Manyeyedhydra tells us: “Hammer had Dracula as a CEO in a later film.” Fittingly, Karl Marx once defined capital as “dead labour which, vampire-like, lives only by sucking living labour, and lives the more, the more labour it sucks”. Manyeyedhydra also suggested that it “seems a really obvious next step for the vampire myth – have the CEO of a Goldman Sachs-type company be an actual vampire squid”.

A fine idea. But perhaps, if we’re pursuing the line that vampires must tell us something about ourselves, it’s more appropriate to look back to Meyer. Perhaps part of her talent lies in the way she was able to realign her vampires to contemporary morality – or at least a pre-Great Recession morality. As she described it, there was considerable virtue in the fact that the Cullen family was stinking rich, wore designer clothes and drove gleaming, expensive cars. In the older stories, blood-sucking parasites were staked through the heart and burned. In modern America, they became aspirational role models. No wonder we’re in such trouble …

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/apr/27/twilight-dracula-vampires-reading-group?newsfeed=true

Anne Rice Talks About Vampires, Werewolves and Zombies ….

 

Among other things, Anne Rice discussed her latest work, The Wolf Gift,” with C2E2 fans

 

Anne Rice, the world-renowned author of “The Vampire Chronicles” novels that began with 1976′s “Interview with a Vampire,” spoke before an admiring crowd at the Chicago Comic & Entertainment Expo about her latest project, her take on werewolves in “The Wolf Gift.” The conversation strayed frequently from the author’s newest work, touching upon vampires (both as viewed by Rice and the sparkly “Twilight” versions), pornography, Jesus — and zombies.

In typical Rice fashion, “The Wolf Gift” re-writes the werewolf legend. “I want to do my version of it — that’s what interests me,” Rice said. Gone is the full moon as transformational trigger; Rice’s hero, Reuben Golding, turns “man wolf” after midnight. He is not a shapeshifter, but physically transforms into a man-wolf hybrid who thinks, talks and has sex with humans while transformed.

“I preferred that it be a physical thing like it was with my vampires,” Rice explained. “They can’t shapeshift. They can’t go through a keyhole or turn into a dog or a bat like Dracula. I wanted to treat the physical question of the man wolf the same way. I wanted him to have those limitations. He did turn into this beast, but there is potentially a scientific explanation for what’s happening to him… Other people might prefer to go a much more magical route. To me, it’s more interesting if it’s scientifically-based and it kind of leaves the hero with the same metaphysical questions that we humans have about the meaning of the soul.”

Reuben Golding, the man wolf character in the novel, is modeled after a particular individual, actor Matt Bomer of the USA Network show “White Collar.” “I was very much inspired by [Bomer] physically when writing the character of Reuben,” Rice said. “I wanted that kind of nice guy, who’ s very good looking and kind of humble about it and sort of appropriately charming… It’s great that you can cast anybody in your novel without calling their agent. I just do it, and I have yet to have anybody get angry about it.”

The character of Reuben is also a bit of a superhero, dispatching rapists, torturers and kidnappers in vigilante style. He is aware of what is happening when in his werewolf form, and is comfortable with the modern conveniences of the 21st century, utilizing modern technology like iPhones and Google searches. “One of the things I really enjoyed doing with Reuben was [writing] someone who was not like the regretful and tortured vampires that I had done before. Someone who was a little more firmly rooted in what was happening. Reuben is much more accepting [of his werewolf status],” Rice explained. “I wanted that strength, that exuberance in this character right in the present moment. I was really asking myself, what would you do right now in the 21st century if you got this gift? If you could change into this powerful beast creature that was completely conscious, how would you — I would do what Reuben does… [He has] potential to be a superhero. What does he think when he gets back to his room about all of this. I mean, I know this has been done, [but] I want to do it my way.”

In contrast to the observational viewpoint of “Interview with a Vampire,” “The Wolf Gift” follows Golding from moment one and never strays from his viewpoint. “I just wanted to stick really close to him and be with him as he discovered what this was all about, Rice told the audience. “I was with him every second, trying to figure what he would do and putting a lot of pressure on myself, again, for it to be authentic. He looks up werewolves on the internet, he takes pictures of himself with his iPhone in the man wolf form. I mean, these are things I would do if it was happening to me. I’ve always not liked supernatural fiction in which the hero seems never to have heard of vampires and was completely unaware they exist. I want my hero to live in the real world where we know about all these things.”

The conversation inevitably evolved from Reuben the man wolf to vampires, Rice’s Lestat in particular. Addressing what might happen should the two characters encounter each other, which is not out as the question as Rice has been known to introduce characters from different cosmologies to each other in the past, Rice said, “I think they’d respect each other… Lestat would be careful. [Reuben] is a guy who can walk in the day, and is very strong and resilient. I think Lestat would be extremely guarded with him, but I think he’d like him. He’d be interested.

“And I think Reuben would be fascinated with Lestat,” Rice continued. “Everybody’s fascinated with Lestat. He’s my irresistible one. I think, anyway.”

Rice was ver candid about the fact that the Lestat character was not a focus for her when writing “Interview with a Vampire,” the character growing in her mind as she created him. “I really didn’t have any interest in the character Lestat. He was just the antagonist. In fact, it was Louis I was interested in… But Lestat just grew and grew and grew, like in the corner of my eye. This character became incredibly coherent and forceful and by the time I went to the sequel to that book, it was Lestat really that I was interested in… It had ceased to be Louis.”

While he was ultimately the star of the “Vampire Chronicles” novel, Lestat was not meant to be more than a supporting character in “Interview with a Vampire”

 

The current popularity of vampires in novels, particularly the popularity of the Stephanie Meyer-penned “Twilight” series, was bound to stir reaction in longtime Rice fans. Controversy has erupted on the Anne Rice Facebook page, with comparisons between the “body sparkling” vampires and the brutal world of Lestat. When Rice entered into the fray in November, the reaction created somewhat of an internet firestorm.

“A lot of Ms. Meyer’s young fans came on the page and said terrible things,” Rice recalled. “They don’t want anybody talking bad about ‘Twilight.’ They don’t want anybody making jokes about ‘Twilight.’ And yet, every day practically somebody comes on my page and makes a joke about sparkling vampires. What can I say?

“What would my vampires do if they met [the 'Twilight'] vampires?” Rice asked. “Would Lestat take pity? Absolutely. Any immortal who had to go to high school over and over…. High school was horrible.”

Despite what her fans might have expected, Rice refuses to criticize the series itself. “The key to ‘Twilight’ is that it really works,” she said. “All those millions of readers. And the reason it works, I think, is that it taps into the belief on the part of the reader that if you met Lestat or Edmund or anyone else, he would fall in love with you. He would never hurt you. That’s a stroke of genius on [Meyer's] part, to write that kind of thing and make it work. I think it’s wonderful that she’s been so successful and all these kids are reading these books I think it’s great.”

Rice has written about more than vampires, witches and werewolves, with some surprising turns in her nearly 40 year career. One such literary side-road was an early ’80s foray into pornography with her “Sleeping Beauty” trilogy.

“I wanted to write an authentic pornography,” Rice recalled. “I was very dissatisfied with pornography. I felt that it was written by hacks who were contemptuous of the audience. Most pornography contained a lot of material that the audience didn’t really want. That they didn’t really want blood, violence, toolbox murders, stuff like that. They really just wanted a lot of sex. I thought, ‘What if I can do some S&M porn that’s like the Disneyland of S&M?’ People could have a really good time and then they can go home. I wanted to try this. And that’s really why I did it. I felt a great pressure to do it.

“By the time the trilogy was done, I had done it,” Rice continued. “I had put the fantasy down on paper and I had put it out in the world… I don’t know any harm that it’s ever done anybody.” Reacting to some criticism in the mainstream press that decry the female as passive in porn, Rice said women had every right to fantasize about sex in any way they wanted.

“We have equality,” she said. “Equality means we can fantasize about being raped by a pirate if we want to.”

Rice’s career took a radically different turn in the mid ’00s when the author penned a pair of historical novels about the life of Jesus Christ. “I was really trying to write something that would get into the character of Jesus and yet be absolutely Biblically correct and historically correct and correct according to the milieu of the first century,” she said. “I did exhaustive research and I was very happy with what happened with that… I wanted to take all the most unusual, the most extreme aspects of the gospels and put them all in there. No avoiding, no humanizing, no skipping. What is it like this afternoon in Nazareth for the guy who’s mother is a virgin and who’s birth was greeted with angels, and yet here he is 30 years old and people — you know he’s a carpenter — people say, what was that all about? What are we waiting for? Who are you?

“I put all of that into those books,” Rice continued. “I first wrote about [Jesus] as a child, then as a young man. And I was very happy with it. I had to stop the series because I got into the theological discussions of his public life. What he meant, what he said, what he did — all of that. And I couldn’t take it any more. It was right at the point at which I walked away from organized religion. I said, I just don’t belong with these people. My faith in God is one thing, but I can’t go with organized religion. I simply can’t. I went back to writing more about my kind of outsiders. Jesus, for me, was very much an outsider in those books. And he was certainly a superhero, potentially. I’m very proud of them, and I love it that those books have their own [audiences].”

With such a wide range of worlds covered throughout her career, Rice joked about potential future projects, including something working with the idea of zombies. “‘The Zombie Romance,’ by Anne Rice,” she said, laughing before taking a run at the eternal zombie-vampire question: if a vampire bites a zombie, does the zombie become a vampire, or does the vampire become a zombie? “If it’s ‘Night of the Living Dead’ zombies, I would say it would be catastrophic. That, with the vampire blood — they would become stronger and more powerful, but they would not be cured of zombieism!”

http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=38311

Oh Man Would You Do This – Taking a “Twilight” Themed Wedding TOO FAR ???

Martin Hill Photography/

On some level we all knew this day would come. Given how readily we made the elements — replicas of Bella’s bridal couture, jewel accented hair clip & engagement ring are all available online — it was inevitable that someone would throw a legitimate Twilight-themed wedding. But even I never imagined it would go this far.

Meet Abigail and Andy, a British couple who married on February 5 in England while wearing real world replicas of Bella & Edward’s Breaking Dawn Part 1 wedding attire (although she only changed into a Carolina Herrera knock-off for their reception).

Twilight tunes also filled the air as the bride walked down the aisle to the instrumental version of Sleeping At Last’s Turning Page (featured in the last film) and Bella’s Lullaby played as they walked back up the aisle. Then, just like Bella and Edward, Abby and Andy shared their first kiss as a married couple while Iron & Wine’s Flightless Bird, American Mouth played. Plus, the entire Breaking Dawn – Part 1 soundtrack served as background music during the reception.

The wedding itself also stuck very closely to the color schemes, floral arrangements, bridal bouquet and wedding cake shape that were featured in the film.

However, Andy and Abby saved the best (read: craziest) for last as they legally changed their married surname to Cullen following the ceremony!

Yes, that’s right, they emerged from this Twilight-themed wedding as Andy & Abby Cullen. The new Mrs. Cullen says that her husband is “very tolerant, bless him” for being such a good sport about it all.

If that isn’t the understatement of the century, I don’t know what is!

 

Watch Kristen Turn Into A Vampire !!!

It’s the moment we’ve all been waiting for, ‘Twilight Saga’s’ Bella Swan finally turning into a vampire!

Twihards were treated to a sneak peek of the ‘Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn: Part 2′ trailer when a teaser of it hit the internet.

It is thought that the teaser was shown to promote the DVD release of the first part of the final movie in the vampire franchise which saw Bella, played by Kristen Stewart get married to Edward Cullen played by her on-screen boyfriend, Robert Pattinson.

Having been turned into a vampire by Edward, Bella can be seen encompassing the vampire look, with pale skin and red eyes. Talking to Edward in the clip, Bella can be seen saying: “It’s strange. Physically I feel like I could demolish a tank. Mentally I feel just drained.”

Since filming for the ‘Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn’, both Kristen and Rob have been busy with new films. Kristen playing Snow White in ‘Snow White And The Huntsman’ and Rob as womaniser Georges Duroy in ‘Bel Ami’, who has been described as an “absolute devil” by the actor.

Check the video here!

What do you think?

Kristen Stewart Can’t Keep Her Hands Off Robert Pattinson

 

Blade Meets Twilight – Oh Really?

Alexander Aja has managed to make a batch of pretty diverse horror movies — some good, some bad — that suggest he’s got serious chops that just desperately require a good script to flourish. So while I can expect Undying Love to be a well-constructed film, I can currently only guess if graphic novelists and screenwriters Tomm Coker and Daniel Freedman will cough up the kind of script that will do justice to Aja’s filmmaking skill.

The writing duo are adapting their own graphic novel into a screenplay for Warner Brothers, who optioned the story of a soldier who’s fallen in love with a beautiful Chinese vampire whose creator must be destroyed in order for her to become human again. So really this mixes Blade with a sort of anti-Twilight in which a human meets a vampire, and instead of falling in with her crowd and becoming desperate to be turned, he murders everyone like her until she’s human again. Built around Chinese mythology, the comic also apparently mixes in an underground mob element as the powerful vampire apparently commands quite an army to protect him.

Nothing’s set in stone yet, but this sounds like a good way for Aja to expand his wheelhouse a bit, without entirely leaving it.

Also: Vampires. Tired. Etc.

http://www.chud.com/86144/looks-like-blade-will-finally-meet-twilight-in-alexandre-ajas-undying-love/

Are Angels The New Vampires???

If angels are the new vampires, then “Embrace” is a worthy follow-up to “The Twilight Saga.” The kickoff to a new young adult series from debut author Jessica Shirvington has many of the same strengths – and flaws – as the Stephenie Meyer blockbuster with a heroine who doesn’t understand her own strengths and becomes entangled in a complicated, steamy, love triangle.
“Embrace” opens on the eve of Violet’s 17th birthday – a bittersweet occasion that overlaps with the anniversary of her mother’s death. Violet knew her mom had died in childbirth. What she didn’t understand was that her mother knew she would die and had prepared a gift and a cryptic, premonitory letter for Violet to open 17 years later, warning her of a “big decision” and encouraging her to “believe in the unbelievable” and “choose with (her) heart.”

Violet, it soon becomes clear, is an angel of exceptional power. She just needs to embrace that destiny to realize it fully. And to do that, she must literally jump off a cliff.
Unbeknown to Violet, her pairing with the self-defense expert with whom she was training, and falling in love, for two years wasn’t accidental. The ridiculously gorgeous Lincoln had sought her out to complete a partnership deigned by the angels’ ruling body, the Seraphim. Lincoln hadn’t told Violet they were destined to be angel partners – or that consummating their attraction for each other was forbidden. She finds out by accident, and, as a result, becomes angry at Lincoln for his betrayal.
Violet’s anger toward Lincoln is relentless but tinged with desire. It’s also overblown since his reasons for secrecy were reasonable. This romantic meltdown is a critical plot point that propels Violet into the arms of another desirable male who may not be good for her, but it also reveals the fatal flaw of “Embrace” – that Violet, who tells the story from her perspective, is somewhat unlikable.
Prone to swooning at the many smolderingly attractive male angels she meets, Violet is petulant, reactionary and overly emotional, which could very well endear “Embrace” to its intended young adult audience, but this is somewhat off-putting for more mature readers otherwise likely to enjoy this story about a young woman choosing her future in such a fantastical manner.
Shirvington has a terrific story to tell, and she does a great job of slowly unspooling a complicated plot involving angels at war, but her writing style lacks grace. Her description of an exiled angel named Phoenix as “pretty damn close to a perfect brooding hottie” demonstrates her lead character’s liberal use of base, if modern, language and further undermines the book’s literary aspirations.
Shirvington is at her creative best when detailing Violet’s experiences as an angel. Whenever she senses the presence of Phoenix, she tastes apples and hears flapping wings. It’s too bad that the flip side of her extrasensory powers creates the impression that Violet can barely control herself, least of all around angel men, all of whom are, like the vampires in “Twilight,” significantly older than they appear.
There’s quite a bit of scantily clad clubbing and some sexual content in “Embrace,” but the descriptions are mostly PG. There are also some fairly grisly murder scenes, as dark angels attempt to establish their dominance by offing other angels, including those in Violet’s circle.
“Embrace” isn’t without its issues, but it’s an interesting enough story that many readers will want to continue with the next installment to see how the intriguing love triangle evolves.
Copyright 2012 . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Read more here: http://www.bnd.com/2012/03/07/2088782/in-embrace-there-are-similarities.html#storylink=cpy

How The New Literature On Vampires Has Changed People’s Thinking ….

 

Here’s my dirty little secret: I like Twilight.

 

That said, I was never really into the vampire craze, and 500-page rhapsodies to true and blood-based love (I am speaking of Breaking Dawn and the ilk) make me sick. So my even dirtier secret is that for the past week I’ve been ensconced in a show called The Vampire Diaries.

 

Stake me now.

 

Outside of campy entertainment I will never advocate the show, but the vampire craze is worth a second look. For one thing, every civilization of every age has been drawn to the myth. As Bella’s unprofitable Google search back in 2003 proved, there are thousands of variations on the vampire theme: stakes, sunlight, coffins, fangs, mirrors, blood consumption, holy water, exorcisms, crucifix allergies, and so on. From Hebrew demonology to Madagascar’s ramenga (who eat the toenail clippings of nobles!), it’s clear that humans have always been fascinated by blood-suckers.

 

If that’s not disturbing enough, look at the vampire myths from a gender perspective. The central theme of VampLit is the strong (and beautiful and centuries-old smart) male vs. the weak, virginal female. Many variations—I would place Anne Rice’s Interview with a Vampire among them—nearly ignore the romantic relationship between a vampire man and a human woman. They often focus instead on religious themes. Is the vampire damned or not? What is the point of this nearly immortal life?

 

Then there was a brief reclamation of the vampire myth for female empowerment in Joss Wheadon’s Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Laurell K. Hamilton’s Anita Blake. But ever since Twilight, vampire retellings have harkened (sometimes disturbingly for the feminists among us) back to the sexism of Bram Stoker’s original.

 

A myriad of angry articles are out there about Bella Swan’s domestic side—love of doing laundry and cooking—and endearing clumsiness juxtaposed to Edward Cullen’s emotionally abusive tendencies. But there’s no reason to discuss those as you could look up the definition of “imbroglio” on your own.

 

The recent surge in vampire stories displays a hunger in our society for the stability often found in traditional gender roles. Stephanie Meyer’s Mormonism has drawn a lot of heat from critics of the book, but her portrayal of Edward and Bella’s relationship has undeniable appeal to women. Recent social changes have created a void where once we had carefully defined functions. Men were men by assuming such roles as dedicated employee, faithful husband, loving father. Women were women by becoming competent and loving housewives and tender mothers who always have an after-school snack prepared for their children.

 

But today it’s more complicated than that: a person’s assumption of certain roles no longer defines his or her masculinity or femininity. With divorce rates skyrocketing and sex outside of marriage no longer considered fornication by the average citizen, a wedding and subsequent family life is no longer a given. The current fluidity this has caused in society leaves men and women noticeably lost, bouncing from partner to partner, comfortable but unhappy with the idea that love is relevant and sex is meaningless.

 

This is where the vampires come in.

 

The romance part of current VampLit it is old news. For nearly every period in history, romance novels have outsold (by the millions) and thus supported the literature of publishing houses. Women always have and, if book sales are anything to judge by, always will enjoy reading about their ideal man, picturing themselves as the idealized woman.

 

But using VampLit as the pattern by which masculinity and femininity are now being measured by women this is what we find: the ideal man is beautiful and brooding, impossibly strong, but just as impossibly sweet. He is the perfect boyfriend: willing—torturing himself—to listen. And he’s a vampire—so fast and strong that no human—man or woman—could conceivably compete.

 

This is the important detail.

 

There’s nothing wrong with the female heroines of these novels. (Get off Bella’s back, women. Not everyone is coordinated, nor is there anything extraordinarily anti-feminist about a girl who likes to cook and hang around the home reading literature.) In fact, these girls are often extraordinary in some way. But they are human and are therefore dependent on their vampire boyfriend: dependent on them to protect them from other vampires and inform them about vampire-y things. Fantastically-contrived dependence: female leads are still modern, independent women, as strong as a human (man or woman) can be expected to be, and yet there is someone on whom she can and must always rely on to protect her and must listen to because she can’t be expected to know the details of the vampire world. He is her manly provider.

 

One of the most common complaints about these vampire love stories is how quickly the characters declare their love and their intention to be together forever. Within hours—days maybe—fate has arranged their relationship thus that no man or plot contrivance (the impossibly sweet Jacob Black included) could ever separate them. An arranged marriage, in other words: a marriage wherein she—sweet and supportive—depends on him, and he—reliable, attentive, and faithful—actually is dependable.

 

These contrivances harkens back to traditional female roles in a way that has not gone unnoticed. However, the vampire love story isn’t about putting women back in “their place,” but about bringing relationships back to a different time period, when men knew how to be manly and women knew how to be womanly. When there were rules and a structure and something more than relativism.

 

Fiction has provided the arena wherein reality can be manipulated so that this more traditionalist dynamic in a relationship can exist while both characters maintain their status in modern society. Edward may be whipped, but he’s still hot and could take any guy in the school who might dare. Bella might be totally dependent on her vampire for love and safety, but she’s still Bella—smart, quirky, and intensely loyal to her family and friends.
Vampire literature is an attempt to give women some cake and let them eat it, too.

 

And yet, hunger doesn’t begin to describe the way women all across the age spectrum lusted after Meyer’s “bizarrely moral” Edward Cullen. And that is because Edward is (forgive me) exactly their brand of heroin. He wants Bella. He is inexorably drawn to her: not only sexually and vampirically, but—perhaps most importantly—mentally. Bella is the only human whose mind he can’t read. We can all write that off as a stupid plot-contrivance (and, believe me, I know it is), but it’s important in understanding what women want.  Not someone who can read her mind, but someone who wants to. Perhaps that’s why Stephan and Elena (a la The Vampire Diaries) fall flat for me. He doesn’t thirst for her thoughts the way Edward did with Bella, and Elena doesn’t have half of Bella’s mind.

 

Stephanie Meyer had her finger on the pulse of what women want far more than Mel Gibson ever could have. Women want to be listened to, to be interesting, to be wanted, so there’s Jacob Black and maybe even the hapless Mike Newton. But women also want—desperately—to have someone to rely on without being weak. So there’s Edward Cullen, who is impossibly older and stronger than Bella Swan. Where the fantastical contrivance falls apart is that woman want someone to depend upon—not necessarily be dependent on. There is a difference, and I believe that difference is impossible to show in VampLit and is therefore the crux of the misunderstanding revolving around the new vampire craze.

 

Interestingly, Bella (and most female leads in VampLit) cannot depend on her human girlfriends. Even more interesting is that the male vampire often does have a brother or a coven on which he can rely. Much is made about the isolation of adolescent boys in our society, but the isolation of the adolescent female is intense as well, and if the age-spectrum of Twilight’s audience is anything on which to judge, it doesn’t end with pimples. It appears that modern women view modern men as Edward is—isolated in his own thoughts, but always supported by other men. But they identify with Bella—alone and searching for someone who can keep up with them, support them.

 

Just like in VampLit, women aren’t looking for that support in other women, but in a man. Most have learned a long time ago—maybe when their best friend stopped talking to them because she was too popular for her, maybe when she “stole” the guy she liked—not to trust their girlfriends. Twilight critics can rage about how Bella ignores her friends for her new boyfriend, but I think it would be hard to deny that with or without Bella’s example, Girl World has been in trouble for a long time.

 

This feeling of isolation amidst the jungle of Girl World is another symptom of the uncertainty surrounding gender roles today. Men don’t know how to be men, and women don’t know how to be women. There’s no playbook anymore, no accepted standard. We’re leaving Leave It to Beaver behind to form a much more muddled society, some bad, some good. Equality for women in society and the workforce (while undeniably not yet reached), is a beautiful step in the right direction. But closely following on its heels is this confusion about roles in society.

 

The recent phenomenon of VampLit indicates dissatisfaction with this muddle. It indicates that women are looking for stability and reliability (not exactly breaking news), and also—more notably—that they might be willing to sacrifice quite a bit of independence for it. But if a woman doesn’t have a vampire—or at least a dependable someone who loves her unconditionally and thirsts for her thoughts—why would she sacrifice her cake for an apple?

http://www.popmatters.com/pm/feature/152956-learning-from-vampires/